Diana didn't bring a whole lot in the critical thinking department to the party. The Aristos are only slightly less in-bred than the Royals.
Think about the situation if this doofus was actually going to become a practicing head-of-state rather than a figurehead. What if he were born 300 years ago? Oh wait, they already had that - George III. :D
Say what you will, but William and Harry (even with Harry's slip-ups) do seem to be doing well, and also seem to be decent human beings--despite their life under a microscope.
So if Charles did nothing else right, he helped raise two thoughtful and caring young men.
Michelle, Charles had minimal to do with how the boys were raised. Eton (or wherever they went) had more to do with their current character than he did.
I am a Hot Chick living in Castle Rock, CO with my fabulous family. We have a rescue dog named "Jackson," and she's a Basenji/Shepherd mix. She's something of a head case, but we love her. I'm a U.S. Navy vet, and I currently work as an Enterprise Solutions Architect, specializing in VoIP and multimedia contact center design. I care about social justice, libraries, science, the U.S. Constitution and the military. I'm a tax and spend liberal in a largely red county, but I try not to be stabby about it. I knit for charity. Stupidity, cupidity and wanton assholery piss me off, and I'm more than a little soft when it comes to dogs and those who serve others. I blog about whatever I feel like. I use foul language, so if that sort of thing offends you, feel free to fuck off now - if I'm unwilling to clean up my language for my fabulous Great Auntie Margie, I'm unlikely to do so for you. Newcomers are welcome here, especially those who disagree with me, but trolling and spamming will be met with the Shovel of Doom™.
12 comments:
Who cares? Sure as hell not me.
Observation: Royalty doesn't age well. Inbreeding and longevity, never a good combination.
I was just thinking it's lucky his sons take after their mother.
Yeah, they have chins. ;)
And hopefully critical thinking skills.
Diana didn't bring a whole lot in the critical thinking department to the party. The Aristos are only slightly less in-bred than the Royals.
Think about the situation if this doofus was actually going to become a practicing head-of-state rather than a figurehead. What if he were born 300 years ago? Oh wait, they already had that - George III. :D
Inbreeding does tell, doesn't it?
Other than the queen herself, the Royals in general are a not aging well at all.
And like Camilla was such a great addition, probably a good thing she didn't breed with that bunch...
WendyB_09
Say what you will, but William and Harry (even with Harry's slip-ups) do seem to be doing well, and also seem to be decent human beings--despite their life under a microscope.
So if Charles did nothing else right, he helped raise two thoughtful and caring young men.
Though I still think he's funny looking.
Michelle, that appears to be true, so I'll give him credit for that.
I say "appears" because really, who knows what kind of people they are?
Well, Harry went to fight in Afghanistan despite the multiple outs he was given to stay out of a war zone.
I think that counts for a great deal.
And I think William has been involved in volunteer work in 3rd world countries.
So I think that counts for a lot.
Michelle, Charles had minimal to do with how the boys were raised. Eton (or wherever they went) had more to do with their current character than he did.
That may be John, but he didn't fuck them up, so I think that counts for something.
Post a Comment